BACHELOR OF EDUCATION STUDENTS’ SKILLS IN MANAGING IN THE E-LEARNING EDUCATIONAL PROCESS: ESSENCE AND STRUCTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol14i6-021Keywords:
e-learning, future teachers, bachelor of education, educational process management, digital environment, digital competence, pedagogical interaction, learning analytics, artificial intelligence, teacher educationAbstract
The article substantiates the need to purposefully develop bachelor of education students’ (teachers’) skills for managing the e-learning educational process. The relevance of the study is determined by the expansion of teachers’ professional functions caused by the widespread use of digital platforms, synchronous and asynchronous learning formats, learning analytics, and artificial intelligence. A teacher is expected not only to use digital tools but also to design the learning structure, organize interactions, coordinate learners’ activities, monitor their progress, and adjust the educational process in a timely manner. The purpose of the article is to provide a theoretical justification for the development of these skills, clarify the meaning of educational process management in e-learning, and determine their structure. The study is theoretical and employs the analysis of scholarly literature, comparison, generalization, systematization, and abstraction. Educational process management in e-learning is a purposeful teacher activity aimed at designing, organizing, coordinating, monitoring, and adjusting learners’ activities in a digital environment. It is argued that this activity is not limited to the administration of a digital platform. It requires aligning learning objectives, content, digital resources, forms of interaction, assessment, and learner support. The structure of future teachers’ skills has been identified. It includes design and organizational skills, communication and coordination skills, monitoring and analytical skills, assessment and regulation skills, ethical and safety-related skills, and reflective skills. The interrelationship between these groups and their cyclical manifestation in teachers’ professional activity has been substantiated. The findings indicate that digital competence is a necessary but insufficient condition for effective e-learning management. The results may be used to update bachelor-level teacher education programs, develop diagnostic tools, and conduct further empirical research on the formation of the identified skills.
References
Akram, H., & Li, S. (2024). Understanding the role of teacher-student relationships in students’ online learning engagement: Mediating role of academic motivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 131(4), 1415–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241248709
Akram, H., Yingxiu, Y., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Technology integration in higher education during COVID-19: An assessment of online teaching competencies through technological pedagogical content knowledge model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 736522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736522
Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), Article 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088
Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L.-A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Fernández, A., Gómez, B., Binjaku, K., & Meçe, E. K. (2023). Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12351–12382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0
Law, V. T. S., Yee, H. H. L., Ng, T. K. C., & Fong, B. Y. F. (2022). Transition from traditional to online learning in Hong Kong tertiary educational institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28, 1451–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09603-z
Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 815220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Simon, P. D., Jiang, J., Fryer, L. K., King, R. B., & Frondozo, C. E. (2025). An assessment of learning management system use in higher education: Perspectives from a comprehensive sample of teachers and students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09734-5
Stavermann, K. (2025). Online teacher professional development: A research synthesis on effectiveness and evaluation. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(1), 203–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09792-9
Tondeur, J., Howard, S. K., Van Zanten, M., Gorissen, P., Van der Neut, I., Uerz, D., & Kral, M. (2023). The HeDiCom framework: Higher education teachers’ digital competencies for the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10193-5
Vermeulen, E. J., & Volman, M. L. L. (2024). Promoting student engagement in online education: Online learning experiences of Dutch university students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 941–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09704-3
Vo, H. M., & Ho, H. (2024). Online learning environment and student engagement: The mediating role of expectancy and task value beliefs. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51, 2183–2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00689-1
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ma Xiao

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)that allows others freely to use (read, copy and print) submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.


