THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SLOW PEDAGOGY AND ITS POTENTIAL IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING WITHIN THE NEW UKRAINIAN SCHOOL CONTEXT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol14i6-015

Keywords:

slow pedagogy, New Ukrainian School, foreign languages, foreign language communicative competence, language anxiety, child-centered education

Abstract

The article provides a theoretical analysis of the concept of slow pedagogy and substantiates its potential in foreign language teaching within the framework of the New Ukrainian School. The origins, development, and key principles of this concept in the contemporary educational context are examined. It is demonstrated that slow pedagogy is part of the broader slow movement in social processes and has emerged as a response to the dominance of a culture of speed, standardization, and an excessive focus on formalized outcomes. The approach emphasizes individual learning pace, reflection, deep comprehension of content, the promotion of learners’ psychological well-being, and meaningful educational experiences. The relationship between slow pedagogy and principles of the New Ukrainian School is analyzed. Shared foundational principles are identified, including child-centered education, competency-based learning, partnership pedagogy, and creation of a safe learning environment. Slow pedagogy can be regarded as a methodological complement to the New Ukrainian School, specifying practical mechanisms for implementing its core principles. The main principles of slow pedagogy are summarized, including mindful learning, balanced workload, the integration of cognitive, emotional, and social components, and the development of students’ resilience and adaptability. It is demonstrated that, in the context of contemporary challenges, this approach contributes to the humanization of education and supports students’ psycho-emotional well-being. The potential application of slow pedagogy in foreign language teaching is outlined. Providing learners with thinking time, using language scaffolding, pair interaction, repeated communicative tasks, and delayed feedback fosters the development of foreign language communicative competence and reduces foreign language anxiety. It is concluded that these approaches promote more conscious and personally meaningful use of a foreign language.

References

Голота Н. Діалогічна взаємодія в освітньому процесі закладу дошкільної освіти як умова ефективного розвитку комунікативної компетентності дітей дошкільного віку. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics. 2022. Vol. 1, № 3. С. 70–79. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20220103.7

Бігич О. Б., Бориско Н. Ф., Борецька Г. Е. Методика навчання іноземних мов і культур: теорія і практика : підручник для студентів класичних, педагогічних і лінгвістичних університетів / за заг. ред. С. Ю. Ніколаєвої. Київ : Ленвіт, 2013. 590 с.

Нова українська школа: порадник для вчителя / під заг. ред. Н. М. Бібік. Київ : ТОВ «Видавничий дім “Плеяди”», 2017. 206 с.

Catalano H., Albulescu I., Stan C., Mestic G., Ani-Rus A. Child-Centered Approach through Slow Education Principles: A View to Child Personality Development in Early Childhood. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, № 11. Article 8611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118611.

Clark A. Slow Knowledge and the Unhurried Child: Time for Slow Pedagogies in Early Childhood Education. London : Routledge, 2023. 172 p.

Dýrfjörð K., Hreinsdóttir A. M. Paving the way for slow pedagogy: leadership lessons from Icelandic preschools. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 2025. P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2025.2523040.

Froebel Trust. Slow Pedagogy [Film]. Produced in July 2022. Froebel Trust. URL: https://www.froebel.org.uk/training/films/slow-pedagogy

Goh C. C. M., Burns A. Teaching Speaking: A Holistic Approach,. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2012. 301 p.

Holt M. It’s Time to Start the Slow School Movement. Phi Delta Kappan. 2002. Vol. 84, № 4. P. 264–271.

Horwitz E. K., Horwitz M. B., Cope J. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal. 1986. Vol. 70, № 2. P. 125–132.

Krashen S. D. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford ; New York : Pergamon Press, 1982. 202 p. URL: https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf

Orr D. W. Slow Knowledge. Conservation Biology. 1996. Vol. 10, № 3. P. 699–702.

Payne P. G., Wattchow B. Slow pedagogy and placing education in post-traditional outdoor education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education. 2008. Vol. 12. P. 25–38.

Petrini C. Slow Food: The Case for Taste / translated by W. McCuaig ; foreword by A. Waters. New York : Columbia University Press, 2004. 176 p.

Richards J. C. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2006. 52 p.

Rink B. For slow teaching: courageous and compassionate pedagogy in times of change. South African Geographical Journal. 2025. Vol. 107, № 4. P. 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2025.2472651.

Rowe M. B. Wait-Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables: Their Influence on Language, Logic, and Fate Control. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1974. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 81–94.

Downloads


Abstract views: 27
PDF Downloads: 12

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Otroschenko Л., Budko В., & Symonenko Н. (2026). THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SLOW PEDAGOGY AND ITS POTENTIAL IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING WITHIN THE NEW UKRAINIAN SCHOOL CONTEXT. Education. Innovation. Practice, 14(6), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol14i6-015

Issue

Section

Статті