PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING TEAMWORK SKILLS THROUGH GRANT WRITING IN THE PREPARATION OF EDUCATION PROFESSIONALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol14i4-005Keywords:
grant writing, teamwork, teamwork skills, preparation of education professionals, soft skills, collaborative writing, project-based learning, peer review, shared responsibility, professional preparationAbstract
The article generalizes scholarly approaches to understanding grant writing as a means of developing teamwork skills among education professionals. The relevance of the study is determined by the growing role of teamwork in today’s educators' professional activity and by the insufficient theoretical generalization of pedagogical practices that enable the purposeful development of these skills through work on grant proposals. The aim of the article is to generalize practices for developing teamwork skills through grant writing and to identify pedagogical solutions that ensure a transition from formal group activity to meaningful teamwork during the preparation of a grant proposal. The study's methodological framework combines systemic, competency-based, and activity-based approaches. The methods used include theoretical analysis of scholarly sources, comparison, generalization, interpretation, classification, and typologization. The study shows that grant writing has considerable pedagogical potential for developing teamwork skills because it integrates shared problem framing, goal alignment, role distribution, coordinated decision-making, collaborative writing, internal review, reflection, and responsibility for the common result. The most productive practices were found to be joint conceptual work on the problem, functional distribution of responsibility, peer review, shared regulation of the work process, and team reflection. It is argued that grant writing should be understood not only as an applied skill related to project documentation but also as a pedagogically organized activity in which communicative, cognitive, organizational, and ethical dimensions of teamwork are integrated. The article emphasizes that the developmental effect of grant writing depends on deliberate pedagogical organization and does not arise automatically from group work itself. The limitations of the study include its generalizability, the lack of original empirical verification, and its partial reliance on research from adjacent fields. Prospects for further research include developing and testing instructional models of grant writing to foster teamwork skills among students.
References
Al-Salti, A. S., Awwad, F., Ayyoub, H. Y., & Al-Serhan, A. (2025). Shared metacognition and its relationship to cognitive and teaching presence in the blended learning environment among bachelor’s students at the University of Jordan. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.10.2413
Burgess, A. W., van Diggele, C., Roberts, C., & Mellis, C. (2020). Team-based learning: Design, facilitation and participation. BMC Medical Education, 20, Article 461. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y
Febriana, N., Ermanto, & Abdurahman. (2025). Developing team-based project model combined with flipped classroom for scientific writing in higher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(10), 1700-1707. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.10.2427
Grant, P., & McGhee, P. (2025). I am responsible for who I become: Reframing students’ sense of responsibility for their ethics and academic integrity. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 22. https://doi.org/10.5840/jbee2025226
Hryhorenko, T., & Semenog, O. (2025). From content to competencies: How project-based learning transforms the higher education paradigm. Cherkasy University Bulletin: Pedagogical Sciences, (2), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.31651/2524-2660-2025-2-5-12
Jiang, D., & Kalyuga, S. (2022). Learning English as a foreign language writing skills in collaborative settings: A cognitive load perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 932291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932291
Joshi, T., Budhathoki, P., Adhikari, A., Poudel, A., Raut, S., & Shrestha, D. (2022). Team-based learning among health care professionals: A systematic review. Cureus, 14(1), e21252. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21252
Kumari, H., & Vitharana, P. R. K. A. (2024). The perception of teacher educators on developing soft skills among prospective teachers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.806232
Mu, L., Rus lan, & Abidah, A. (2025). The influence of the project-based learning model on enhancing collaboration and learning responsibility among electronics students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.906000451
Mulyadi, E., Riyanto, Y., & Kristanto, A. (2024). The influence of collaborative blended learning through written small group discussion model on high school students’ English writing skills. KUIYAH: Journal of Education, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3051
Mwita, K. M., Kinunda, S. O., Obwolo, S., & Mwilongo, N. H. (2023). Soft skills development in higher education institutions. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 12(3), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2435
Recio-Saucedo, A., Crane, K., Meadmore, K., Fackrell, K., Church, H., Fraser, S., & Blatch-Jones, A. (2022). What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: A realist synthesis. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 7, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00120-2
Verster, B., van den Berg, C., & Collett, K. (2023). Relational reading~writing~thinking~becoming in higher education: Possibilities for scholarly reading and writing in times of turbulence. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v11i2.2007
Wang, L., & Ren, B. (2024). Enhancing academic writing in a linguistics course with generative AI: An empirical study in a higher education institution in Hong Kong. Education Sciences, 14(12), Article 1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121329
Weber, F., Wambsganss, T., & Söllner, M. (2024). Enhancing legal writing skills: The impact of formative feedback in a hybrid intelligence learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13529
Wei, Y., & Liu, D. (2024). Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: A systematic review of benefits and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1506725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1506725
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492-526. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266
Yurchenko, A., Drushlyak, M., Khvorostina, Y., Ostroha, M., Ponomarenko, V., & Semenikhina, O. (2024). The impact of team competitions on the development of soft skills in youth. In 2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO) (pp. 323–328). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569574
Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Grossmann, G., Ladjal, D., & Pardo, A. (2024). The perceptions of task cohesion in collaborative learning teams. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 19, 393-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09424-5
Zhao, Y., Zheng, Y., Sun, M., & Li, Y. (2024). Exploring online collaborative learners’ socially shared regulation of learning behavior patterns in different engagement groups. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.10.2.255-260
Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. (2022). Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34, 166-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09337-y
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Микола Каплієнко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)that allows others freely to use (read, copy and print) submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.


